The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is taking bold action against Google. After years of investigation and a court ruling, the DOJ now wants to break up parts of the tech giant to reduce its power in the search engine market. The department believes Google’s control of search and its increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) make it too dominant.
This case could reshape how tech companies operate and compete in the future. It could also affect how we search the internet every day.
The DOJ started its antitrust case against Google back in 2020. At the center of the issue is how Google maintains its top spot in search. The government says Google uses unfair methods to stop other companies from competing.
One of the biggest problems is Google’s deals with phone and browser makers. These agreements make Google the default search engine on most devices. For example, Google reportedly paid Apple around $20 billion in 2022 to stay as the default search option on iPhones.
Because of these deals, users often don’t switch to other search engines—even if they’re available. This helps Google keep over 90% of the U.S. search market.
In August 2024, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google did, in fact, break U.S. antitrust laws. The judge said Google’s deals with companies like Apple and Mozilla hurt fair competition. He also agreed with the DOJ’s claim that Google made it hard for other search engines to grow.
Now that the court has sided with the government, the next step is deciding how to fix the problem. That’s where the new “Google search antitrust remedy” comes in.
The Department of Justice has offered several powerful solutions to reduce Google’s control. These proposals are historic and could deeply change how Google does business.
Here’s what the DOJ is asking for:
The biggest request is that Google may be forced to sell or separate some of its services—especially the Chrome browser. Chrome is one of Google’s most important tools. Since millions of people use it to access the web, Google has huge influence over what users see. By owning both the browser and the search engine, Google controls too much of the internet experience.
The DOJ wants to ban the contracts that make Google the default search engine on smartphones, tablets, and computers. These deals are what helped Google dominate the market. Without them, other search engines like Bing, DuckDuckGo, or even AI-powered tools could have a better chance to compete.
Another bold proposal is forcing Google to share key search data—such as rankings, click rates, and user behavior—with smaller search engine companies. This data helps improve search quality. Right now, only Google benefits from it. If shared, it could help level the playing field.
The DOJ is also worried about Google’s use of artificial intelligence in search. AI tools like Google’s Gemini are becoming more powerful and may give Google an even bigger edge. The department suggests that Google should give early notice before making large investments or changes in AI. This way, regulators can keep an eye on how it affects the market.
Additionally, the DOJ wants websites to have the option to stop Google from using their content to train AI models. This is important for small publishers and content creators who feel that Google benefits from their work without giving anything in return.
AI is changing how search works. Instead of just showing links, search engines are now summarizing information, answering questions directly, and giving suggestions—all powered by AI. Google has invested billions into developing AI that improves its search results.
The DOJ worries that if Google controls both the search platform and the AI models powering it, no one else will be able to catch up. Competitors may not have enough data or access to users to build their own AI-based tools.
By including AI in this antitrust case, the DOJ is making it clear that the future of tech—and not just the past—is under review.
Google says that its success comes from building the best products—not from blocking competition. According to the company, people choose Google because they like it, not because they’re forced to use it.
In response to the DOJ’s demands, Google argues that breaking up its products will hurt users. For example, separating Chrome from Google Search could lead to worse performance, fewer features, and even higher costs for consumers and device makers.
Google also points to new AI-based competitors like ChatGPT as proof that the market is changing and competition is still alive.
If the court agrees with the DOJ’s proposed remedies, it would mark one of the most significant antitrust decisions in modern tech history. It would not only change Google’s business model but also send a message to other tech companies.
Here’s what could happen:
While the DOJ’s proposals are strong, it’s still up to the judge to decide what changes will be enforced. Google is expected to fight back hard, and the case could take months—or even years—to reach a final decision.
Legal experts say that courts don’t often order breakups, but the unique power of tech companies today could make this a special case.
The Google search antitrust remedy is more than just a legal battle—it’s a sign that governments are finally catching up with Big Tech. As Google grows more powerful through AI and its online services, regulators are stepping in to ensure fair competition.
Read Next – FTC Sues Uber Over Uber One Subscription Practices and Customer Complaints
In a highly anticipated matchup, the LSU Tigers secured a commanding 44–21 victory over the…
The name Molly McGovern might not be immediately recognizable to everyone, but her story is…
Actor Mark Consuelos shocked his fans with a drastic change to his iconic look when…
Dr. Dre, the name that changed the face of hip hop and revolutionized the music…
ActBlue is one of the most important yet often misunderstood tools in American politics today.…
: California's economy has achieved a remarkable feat by ranking as the fourth-largest economy globally.…