The United States is preparing to take strong action against China’s dominance in the global shipbuilding market. A newly proposed policy suggests that oil supertankers built in China could face steep port entry fees—potentially as high as $5.2 million per visit—to American ports.
This proposed move is not just about economics. It reflects growing concerns in the U.S. government about national security, unfair trade practices, and the need to protect its domestic shipbuilding industry, which has been struggling for years. At the heart of this discussion lies the increasing global presence of Chinese-built oil supertankers, which now make up a large portion of the world’s maritime fleet.
China currently builds more commercial vessels than any other country in the world. This includes tankers, bulk carriers, and container ships. The reason? Chinese shipyards receive massive support from their government. They enjoy subsidies, tax breaks, and financing options that most other shipbuilding countries simply can’t match.
As a result, the cost of building a ship in China is significantly lower than in the United States or Europe. While this has helped China dominate the market, it has also led to the closure of shipyards and job losses in Western countries, including the U.S.
Now, American policymakers want to level the playing field. By introducing high port fees for Chinese-built oil supertankers, the U.S. hopes to encourage shipping companies to consider non-Chinese shipbuilders—or even return to American-built vessels.
The proposed fee structure is bold. Here are some key figures:
These numbers have shocked many in the shipping industry. Port fees are usually only a fraction of what is now being proposed. But U.S. officials argue that these charges are necessary to protect national interests and reduce dependence on China.
The oil shipping industry could be one of the hardest hit by these changes. Most of the world’s large oil tankers, including VLCCs and Ultra Large Crude Carriers (ULCCs), are built in China. These ships carry crude oil across oceans, connecting oil-producing countries with major energy consumers like the U.S.
For companies that operate these tankers, the proposed fees represent a massive new expense. Some estimates suggest that two-thirds of the global crude oil fleet would be impacted. If these fees go into effect, oil transportation costs to the U.S. could rise sharply.
In turn, this could lead to:
Not everyone is happy with the proposal. Several trade groups, economists, and international stakeholders have raised concerns.
For example, U.S. exporters, especially in agriculture and energy, worry that their products will become more expensive overseas. If oil shipping becomes costlier, that could hurt American oil and gas exports. Likewise, U.S. farmers fear that increased shipping costs could make their grain and food products less competitive globally.
Shipping companies are also speaking out. Many argue that it’s unfair to punish them for buying Chinese-built ships when there are limited alternatives. Building a large commercial ship in the U.S. can take years and cost significantly more. In many cases, no American shipyard currently offers the types of vessels required for international oil transport.
Some critics even warn that this move could backfire by sparking a trade war. China could respond by imposing its own restrictions on American goods or services.
Despite the pushback, the U.S. government is standing firm on its reasoning. Officials believe that China’s dominance in shipbuilding creates long-term security risks. Many of the world’s biggest ships are now built in Chinese-controlled yards. In a time of conflict or tension, access to these vessels—or even the parts to repair them—could become uncertain.
This is not just about trade, they argue. It’s about control over strategic industries that are essential during emergencies, such as wars or global supply disruptions. In that sense, reducing reliance on Chinese-built ships is seen as part of a broader national defense strategy.
The big question is whether this move will actually succeed in changing behavior. Shipbuilding is a long-term investment. Vessels can operate for 20 to 30 years, and replacing a fleet takes time and planning.
Still, if the proposed fees are approved, shipping companies may start to look elsewhere. South Korea and Japan also have strong shipbuilding industries, although their costs are typically higher than China’s. Some experts think this could be the start of a slow shift in global shipbuilding orders.
Meanwhile, U.S. shipyards could benefit from new demand, especially if the government introduces incentives or subsidies to offset the higher costs of domestic production.
The proposal is still in its early stages. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is currently reviewing feedback from industry stakeholders, port authorities, trade groups, and the public.
Final decisions are expected later this year. If the proposal is approved, the new fees could go into effect in 2026.
In the meantime, companies involved in international shipping, oil trade, and U.S. exports are watching closely. The policy could reshape how oil and other goods flow into and out of the U.S. for years to come.
The proposed $5.2 million port fees on Chinese-built oil supertankers are part of a larger effort by the United States to push back against China’s dominance in critical industries. While the policy has raised eyebrows around the world, it underscores a growing belief in Washington: that economic strength, national security, and global influence are deeply connected.
As global trade becomes more complex and competitive, decisions like these will have far-reaching consequences. Whether or not the fees are implemented, one thing is clear—the era of cheap, Chinese-built ships dominating the oceans may be coming to an end.
Read Next – Ryan Cohen Must Face Shareholder Lawsuit Over Bed Bath & Beyond Sale
Each February, America transforms. Cities turn electric, living rooms become stadiums, and millions gather for…
The stars are no longer the final frontier—they’re the next battleground for innovation, ambition, and…
Artificial Intelligence is no longer a distant future—it’s the dynamic present, and U.S.-based companies are…
Standing tall against the shimmering waters of Lake Michigan, Chicago’s skyline is more than a…
Chicago’s Riverwalk is more than just a scenic stretch of waterfront—it’s a celebration of the…
New York City is vast and ever-changing, but no borough captures its creative pulse quite…