Faramarz Lahijani, a resident of Los Angeles, California, has captured public attention due to a highly unusual and controversial legal case involving a Mega Millions lottery jackpot. Lahijani’s story is not just one of winning life-changing sums of money, but also of a determined pursuit to claim the entirety of a disputed jackpot, raising broader questions about lottery regulations, lost tickets, and the complexities of legal ownership in games of chance. His case has sparked intrigue, debate, and curiosity about the rare and perplexing circumstances surrounding it.
On December 8, 2023, Mega Millions held a drawing for an astonishing $394 million jackpot. Faramarz Lahijani purchased two tickets at the Chevron gas station in Encino, California, a seemingly routine action for lottery enthusiasts. Both tickets bore the same set of winning numbers: 21, 26, 53, 66, 70, and the Mega Ball number 13. According to Lahijani, the numbers were not quick picks but were chosen based on significant input from his children. The family had been using these numbers for decades, believing they brought luck.
The jackpot was split between two winning tickets, each entitled to $197.5 million. Lahijani came forward with one of the tickets, claiming half of the prize, which he successfully collected. However, in an extraordinary twist, Lahijani alleged that he also owned the second winning ticket but had misplaced it before the expiration date for claims.
In December 2024, shortly before the expiration deadline for unclaimed lottery tickets, Lahijani filed a lawsuit against the California Lottery. He argued that the second ticket belonged to him and that he was the rightful owner of both halves of the $394 million jackpot. His legal claim was based on the assertion that purchasing both tickets from the same location with identical numbers demonstrated his ownership. Furthermore, he argued that his timely submission of the first ticket should serve as proof of his intent and ability to claim the second.
The California Lottery has been cautious in its response to the case, citing the necessity of safeguarding the integrity of the lottery system. While unclaimed prizes are generally redistributed to public education funding in California, the legal battle over the second ticket remains unresolved.
Lahijani’s lawsuit has drawn widespread public interest, not only for its unusual nature but also for the broader implications it raises about the handling of unclaimed lottery prizes and the legal framework surrounding lost tickets. Legal experts have weighed in on the case, noting that proving ownership of a lost ticket is inherently difficult, as the physical ticket itself is traditionally the sole determinant of a claim. Without concrete evidence, Lahijani’s case hinges on the credibility of his testimony and any supporting documentation or witnesses who can verify his purchase of the second ticket.
The Chevron gas station in Encino, where the tickets were sold, also became a focal point in the story. As the retailer of both winning tickets, the station received a record-breaking $1.9 million bonus for its role in the jackpot, the highest amount ever awarded to a single California Lottery retailer. This unusual occurrence added another layer of intrigue to the case, as questions arose about the rarity of two identical tickets being sold at the same location.
The odds of winning the Mega Millions jackpot are astronomically low—approximately 1 in 302.6 million. The likelihood of two tickets with the exact same winning numbers being sold at the same retailer and winning the same drawing is even more improbable. However, experts have noted that the intentional purchase of duplicate tickets by the same individual or group is not entirely unprecedented. In cases where lottery players believe strongly in their chosen numbers, they may buy multiple tickets to maximize their winnings if their numbers are drawn. Lahijani’s case appears to fall into this rare category, adding credibility to his claim of owning both tickets.
The outcome of Lahijani’s lawsuit could set a significant legal precedent for how lottery disputes are handled, particularly in cases involving lost or misplaced tickets. Key questions have emerged:
These questions go beyond Lahijani’s case, touching on the fundamental rules and fairness of lottery systems worldwide. The case has also reignited discussions about the responsibility of lottery organizations to provide clear guidance and accessible avenues for players to claim their prizes.
For Faramarz Lahijani, this legal battle is more than a quest for additional wealth—it is a matter of principle. According to those close to him, Lahijani views the second ticket as a rightful extension of his initial claim and believes that justice requires the California Lottery to acknowledge his ownership. His case has drawn support from some members of the public, who admire his determination, as well as skepticism from others who question the feasibility of proving ownership without physical evidence.
Lahijani’s story is also a reminder of the transformative power—and potential complications—of a lottery win. While jackpots are often portrayed as life-changing blessings, they can also introduce unexpected challenges, from legal disputes to intense public scrutiny.
As the lawsuit unfolds, the legal complexities surrounding Faramarz Lahijani’s claim will undoubtedly continue to captivate the public’s imagination. The case represents an unusual intersection of luck, loss, and legal systems, raising important questions about fairness and accountability in lottery operations. Whether Lahijani ultimately succeeds in securing the second half of the jackpot or not, his story has already added a fascinating chapter to the history of lottery winners and disputes.
Also Read: Xuming Li: A Bizarre Case of Neighbor Disputes and Legal Ramifications
The global business travel industry is showing strong signs of recovery and even growth in…
The U.S. National Park Service (NPS), a federal agency responsible for protecting America’s most iconic…
In a major move set to reshape North Carolina’s economy, JetZero, the advanced aircraft manufacturer,…
On June 12, 2025, Micron Technology announced a monumental plan to invest $200 billion in…
Washington, D.C. — June 14, 2025: The United States Army celebrated its 250th anniversary with…
In a significant turn for the U.S. economy, the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index…