As the political landscape in the United States begins to shift ahead of the 2024 presidential election, the Australian green-energy giant Fortescue is signaling that it may rethink its U.S. green-energy projects. The company, known for its ambitious renewable energy initiatives, is growing increasingly cautious as former President Donald Trump gains momentum in his re-election campaign.
Trump’s public stance on climate change and clean energy—marked by skepticism and strong support for fossil fuels—is prompting Fortescue and other global investors to reconsider the future of large-scale renewable investments in the U.S.
In this article, we will explore what this potential shift means for Fortescue, why the company is concerned, how Trump’s possible return is influencing the energy sector, and what this might mean for the future of green-energy development in America.
Why Fortescue Is Reconsidering U.S. Green-Energy Projects
A Rapid Rise in Renewable Commitments
Fortescue, through its green-energy arm Fortescue Future Industries (FFI), has committed billions of dollars globally to clean energy ventures, particularly green hydrogen, wind, and solar power. The company has positioned itself as a global leader aiming to decarbonize heavy industries, especially in the U.S., Australia, and Europe.
Under the Biden administration, the U.S. has become a fertile ground for such ventures, especially after the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, which includes massive tax breaks and incentives for renewable energy projects. Fortescue had planned to build several projects in the U.S. to take advantage of these incentives.
But now, the winds may be shifting.
Trump’s Return: A Risk to Renewable Investment
Policy Uncertainty on the Horizon
Trump has made it clear that if he returns to office, he will reverse many of President Biden’s climate policies, including potentially rolling back the IRA’s clean energy provisions. He has openly criticized wind energy and cast doubt on climate science in the past. His previous administration withdrew from the Paris Agreement, loosened environmental regulations, and heavily supported oil, coal, and natural gas production.
These signals are enough to rattle international investors, especially those like Fortescue, which rely on stable, long-term government backing to execute projects that can take years and billions to complete.
Fortescue’s Executive Chairman Andrew Forrest, a strong advocate of climate action, hinted that the company may pause or redirect its U.S. green-energy projects if Trump’s policies appear to conflict with their environmental goals.
What Fortescue Had Planned for the U.S.
Massive Hydrogen Projects in the Pipeline
Fortescue had announced several U.S. projects in the last two years. These included:
- Green hydrogen plants across multiple states including Texas and Arizona
- Partnerships with local governments and universities for R&D on renewable technologies
- Plans to build manufacturing infrastructure to export green hydrogen to Europe and Asia
- Support for community development and job creation in renewable sectors
These projects were not just about energy. They were expected to create thousands of jobs, boost local economies, and position the U.S. as a global hub for green hydrogen.
Now, all of that could be put on hold.
Andrew Forrest: A Vocal Climate Advocate
Business Leader With Strong Climate Goals
Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest is not your typical billionaire. The mining magnate turned green-energy champion has been vocal about the dangers of climate inaction. He has pledged to transition Fortescue from one of the world’s largest iron ore producers to a global green energy powerhouse.
In response to Trump’s possible return, Forrest stated:
“We’re watching closely. If the U.S. becomes hostile to green energy, we have many other places to go. The world is big, and the climate challenge is urgent.”
This candid statement shows how seriously Fortescue takes the potential risk—and how easily the U.S. could lose a major investor if policy support fades.
What Does This Mean for the U.S. Clean Energy Sector?
A Chilling Effect on Global Investment
Fortescue is not alone. Several other international energy companies are also watching the U.S. political climate before committing to new projects.
If Trump’s return leads to rolling back clean energy incentives, it could:
- Scare off foreign investment in renewable energy
- Slow down the growth of green jobs and infrastructure
- Boost fossil fuel projects as regulations weaken
- Delay the U.S.’s progress toward net-zero emissions by 2050
It also raises questions about policy stability in the U.S. How can investors commit to long-term projects if major laws and incentives can be reversed every four years?
Global Implications of Fortescue’s Decision
Shifting Green Capital Elsewhere
If Fortescue does pull back from the U.S., it’s likely that countries with more consistent climate policies—like Canada, Australia, the EU, and parts of Asia—will become more attractive destinations.
These countries offer:
- Stronger political consensus on climate action
- Financial incentives that are not tied to election cycles
- Public support for green energy and emissions reductions
This shift could cause the U.S. to lose leadership in the global green-energy race, just as it begins to gain ground under the Biden administration.
Can the U.S. Hold On to Its Green Momentum?
A Lot Depends on the 2024 Election
The Inflation Reduction Act has already started to make an impact:
- Billions have flowed into solar, wind, and hydrogen projects
- Jobs in clean energy are growing faster than fossil fuel sectors
- Companies like Tesla, GM, Ford, and even oil giants like BP have jumped into the clean tech space
But much of this momentum could be threatened if the federal government changes direction. Trump’s campaign has not provided a clear plan for energy, but based on his past actions, many experts believe a second term would mean a strong pivot back to fossil fuels.
The Bigger Picture: Climate Action vs. Political Risk
Fortescue’s hesitation to move forward with U.S. projects highlights a larger issue: climate action is vulnerable to politics. While science says emissions must fall rapidly, governments still move at the speed of elections, lobbying, and public opinion.
For the renewable energy sector to thrive, especially for global companies like Fortescue, they need:
- Consistent support across administrations
- Legal protections that prevent reversal of clean energy laws
- A national consensus on the urgency of climate change
Until these are guaranteed, there will always be risk—financial, political, and environmental.
Conclusion: Will Fortescue Stay or Go?
The next few months will be crucial. Fortescue is waiting to see which direction the U.S. heads in—toward more climate action or back to fossil fuels. If Trump regains power and follows through on his promises to cut clean energy funding, the U.S. may lose one of the world’s most aggressive green-energy investors.
On the other hand, if climate policies remain strong and bipartisan support grows, Fortescue may proceed with its ambitious plans, helping the U.S. transition to a clean energy future.
Read Next – Abbott Labs Lowers Outlook Despite Strong Profit Growth
