James Carville on Identity Politics: Time to Focus on Winning

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville has recently voiced strong opinions about the role of identity politics in the Democratic Party. Reflecting on the unsuccessful presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Kamala Harris in 2024, Carville suggests that the party’s emphasis on candidates’ identities may be hindering its ability to win elections. He believes it’s time for Democrats to shift their focus from identity to electability.​

The End of Identity Politics in Democratic Campaigns

In a candid discussion on the “Politics War Room” podcast, Carville declared that the era of identity politics in Democratic campaigns should come to an end. He emphasized that voters are more interested in winning than in the race, gender, or ethnicity of a candidate.​

“No one gives a s–t anymore in a Democratic Party what gender you are, what race you are, what ethnicity you are. They just want to win…we’re not here to make history,” Carville said.​

Carville’s blunt assessment underscores a growing sentiment within the party that success at the ballot box should take precedence over symbolic milestones.​

Lessons from Clinton and Harris’ Campaigns

Carville pointed to the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris as examples where identity politics may have overshadowed strategic considerations. He criticized the notion that it was “someone’s turn” to be the nominee, suggesting that this mindset can be detrimental to the party’s success.​

“Remember, that’s a big, big hangover in Biden world that Obama decided that it was Hillary’s turn, not Biden’s turn, so he couldn’t run [in 2016]. Let me tell you what the ‘turn’ is. The turn is to win,” Carville stated.​

This perspective challenges the idea of predetermined candidacies based on identity, advocating instead for a merit-based approach focused on electability.​

Prioritizing Electability Over Identity

Carville’s central argument is that the Democratic Party should prioritize candidates who have the best chance of winning, regardless of their identity. He insists that the primary goal should be electoral victory.​

“If it’s a woman candidate that has the best chance to win, for God’s sake, let’s rally behind this candidate. If it’s male, let us rally behind that. Whatever it is, the most important criteria is to win the f——g election. Nothing else counts,” he emphasized.​

This approach calls for a pragmatic evaluation of candidates based on their ability to secure votes and win elections, rather than on fulfilling identity-based milestones.​

The Impact of Identity Politics on Voter Perception

Carville has previously expressed concerns that an overemphasis on identity politics can alienate voters. He argues that grouping diverse individuals under broad labels can be perceived as arrogant and may not resonate with the electorate.​

By focusing on common goals and practical solutions, Carville believes the party can better connect with a broader range of voters.​

A Call for Strategic Focus

Carville’s message is clear: the Democratic Party must concentrate on strategies that lead to electoral success. He emphasizes that winning should be the sole objective, and any other motives can be counterproductive.​

“We’re here to make a win and whatever we have to do to win this f—–g election, we’re going to do that. And I think that any time that the Democratic Party has any other motive other than victory, it screws us up,” Carville asserted.​

This perspective encourages the party to adopt a results-oriented approach, focusing on policies and candidates that can secure victories.​

Moving Forward: Embracing a Winning Strategy

Carville’s insights suggest that the Democratic Party should reassess its approach to candidate selection and campaign strategies. By prioritizing electability and focusing on issues that resonate with voters, the party can enhance its chances of success in future elections.​

In summary, Carville advocates for a shift away from identity politics towards a strategy centered on winning. He believes that by doing so, the Democratic Party can better serve its constituents and achieve its political objectives.

Read Next – Trump Administration’s Iran Red Line: Nuclear Weapon Ban