Trump Urges Netanyahu to Avoid Military Action Against Iran, Favoring Diplomatic Talks

In a significant development in U.S.-Israel relations, President Donald Trump has publicly urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to refrain from military action against Iran, emphasizing the importance of ongoing diplomatic efforts to address Iran’s nuclear program. This call for restraint comes as the Trump administration pursues a new nuclear deal with Tehran, a move that has sparked tensions with Israel, a key U.S. ally in the Middle East.

A Push for Diplomacy Over Conflict

During a press conference at the White House on May 28, 2025, Trump revealed that he had cautioned Netanyahu against launching strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, stating that such actions could jeopardize delicate negotiations. “I told Bibi, it’s not appropriate right now. We’re very close to a solution,” Trump said, referring to the ongoing talks aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The president’s remarks reflect a shift toward diplomacy, a departure from his first term when he withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The negotiations, mediated by Oman and held in locations like Muscat and Rome, have seen multiple rounds over recent weeks. Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, has described the talks as “encouraging,” with the U.S. pushing for Iran to halt uranium enrichment that could be used for nuclear weapons. Iran, for its part, insists it seeks nuclear capabilities solely for civilian purposes, such as energy production, and has expressed willingness to provide assurances against weaponization.

Strained U.S.-Israel Relations

Trump’s diplomatic approach has put him at odds with Netanyahu, who has long advocated for a hardline stance against Iran. Israeli officials have expressed concerns that any deal allowing Iran to retain enrichment capabilities would be insufficient to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Reports suggest that Israel has been preparing for potential strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, a move that could escalate tensions in the region and undermine U.S. efforts.

According to a Reuters report, Trump warned Netanyahu last week against actions that could disrupt the nuclear talks. The conversation, described as “tense” by some sources, highlighted a growing rift between the two leaders. Netanyahu, who views Iran as an existential threat to Israel, reportedly sought U.S. support for military action during a visit to Washington in April but was rebuffed by Trump’s announcement of direct talks with Iran.

This divergence in strategy has strained the historically close U.S.-Israel relationship. While Trump has maintained that the alliance remains strong, his administration’s focus on diplomacy has frustrated Israeli officials. Netanyahu’s government has also faced criticism for its reluctance to support U.S.-led ceasefire efforts in Gaza, further complicating bilateral ties.

Iran’s Response and Regional Dynamics

Iran’s leadership has reacted cautiously to Trump’s diplomatic overtures. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused the U.S. of using sanctions and military threats to pressure Tehran while supporting Israel. However, he also signaled Iran’s openness to a deal that respects its right to civilian nuclear activities. “We remain committed to verifiable assurances that we will not develop a nuclear bomb,” Araghchi said in a recent statement, emphasizing Tehran’s position in the negotiations.

The regional context adds complexity to the situation. Israel’s military campaigns in 2024 weakened Iran’s air defenses and its proxies, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, creating what some Israeli officials see as a strategic opportunity to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities. However, Trump’s administration has prioritized stability in the Middle East, viewing a potential deal with Iran as a way to reduce tensions and secure economic benefits, including trade agreements with Gulf states.

A New York Times article noted that Netanyahu has continued to press for military action, even as Trump pushes for a negotiated solution. The report highlighted concerns among U.S. officials that Israel might act unilaterally, risking a broader conflict in the region. Such a move could also draw the U.S. into an unwanted confrontation, a scenario Trump has repeatedly said he wants to avoid.

Domestic and International Reactions

In the U.S., Trump’s approach has drawn mixed responses. Some Republican lawmakers and foreign policy analysts support his diplomatic efforts, seeing them as a pragmatic way to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons without resorting to war. Others, particularly those aligned with neoconservative views, argue that diplomacy with Iran is unlikely to succeed and that a tougher stance is needed. Posts on X reflect this divide, with some users praising Trump’s restraint while others criticize it as a departure from his earlier hardline policies.

Internationally, the negotiations have garnered attention from key players. Saudi Arabia and Qatar, both involved in regional diplomacy, have engaged with Iranian officials to coordinate on the talks. European nations like Britain, France, and Germany, which were part of the original 2015 deal, have expressed cautious optimism about resuming discussions with Tehran. However, Iran’s insistence on maintaining some enrichment capabilities remains a sticking point.

What’s Next for U.S.-Iran-Israel Relations?

As the talks progress, the coming weeks will be critical. Trump has indicated that he is willing to give diplomacy a chance but has also set a limited timeframe for results. In a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in March, he reportedly set a 60-day deadline for a deal, a period that has now passed. A senior Western diplomat told CNN that Trump may allow only a few more weeks before considering military options, though he remains committed to diplomacy for now.

For Netanyahu, the situation presents a strategic dilemma. Striking Iran without U.S. support risks alienating a key ally and escalating tensions in an already volatile region. On the other hand, accepting a deal that Israel deems too lenient could weaken his domestic standing, particularly among his right-wing coalition.

For American readers, the unfolding situation raises questions about the balance between diplomacy and strength in U.S. foreign policy. Trump’s push for a deal with Iran reflects a desire to avoid costly military entanglements, but it also tests the limits of the U.S.-Israel partnership. As one U.S. official put it, “The president wants peace, but he won’t let Iran get a nuclear weapon.” Whether diplomacy can deliver remains to be seen, but the stakes for the Middle East—and the world—are undeniably high.

The Trump administration’s efforts to navigate this complex issue will likely shape U.S. foreign policy in the region for years to come. For now, the focus remains on dialogue, with the hope that a peaceful resolution can prevent a dangerous escalation.

Must Read :- Inspirational Teen Overcomes Childhood Attack to Graduate High School with a 4.0 GPA