Senate Excludes Trillions in Debt to Make Trump’s Tax Bill Seem Cheaper

In a controversial move that has reignited debates over fiscal transparency, the Senate has excluded trillions of dollars in projected national debt when presenting the cost of Trump’s tax bill. This accounting method makes the tax cuts appear more affordable than they truly are, raising serious concerns among economists, lawmakers, and the American public.

At the heart of the issue is how the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Senate budget officials evaluate the fiscal impact of large legislative proposals. By excluding certain long-term costs, the Trump administration’s 2017 tax law was made to look much cheaper—despite evidence suggesting it adds significantly to the national debt.

Let’s break down what this means for the country, how the numbers were manipulated, and what consequences this might have for the U.S. economy.

What Was Trump’s Tax Bill?

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was passed in December 2017. It was a signature legislative victory for the Trump administration and promised major tax cuts for corporations and individuals. At first glance, it seemed to be a win-win. Corporations received a permanent tax rate reduction from 35% to 21%, and individuals saw lower rates too—though theirs were set to expire after 2025.

The plan was sold to the public as a way to stimulate economic growth, increase wages, and bring jobs back to America. However, critics argued that it was heavily tilted in favor of the wealthy and big corporations, while offering only temporary relief to middle-class families.

Now, years later, the true cost of this bill is becoming harder to ignore.

How Did the Senate Exclude Trillions in Debt?

To evaluate legislation like Trump’s tax bill, analysts use a method called dynamic scoring. It accounts for how tax cuts and spending might affect economic growth, which in turn can affect revenues. But here’s the catch: lawmakers can also choose to exclude certain costs based on “assumptions” about future decisions.

In this case, the Senate assumed that temporary parts of the tax cuts—such as individual rate reductions—would expire as scheduled. However, most political experts and lawmakers believe that these cuts will likely be extended in the future to avoid raising taxes on the middle class.

By assuming they would expire, the Senate effectively left out trillions of dollars in expected debt from the official calculations. That gave the illusion that the tax cuts would only cost around $1.5 trillion over 10 years, when in reality, the figure could be closer to $3 trillion or more.

Why Is This Deceptive?

Imagine buying a car with a monthly payment of $500, but telling your family it’s only $250—because you’re assuming you’ll stop driving halfway through the loan term. That’s essentially what the Senate did with Trump’s tax bill debt.

This accounting trick is not illegal, but it’s highly misleading. It hides the long-term impact of the bill, making it difficult for voters and even some lawmakers to understand the full consequences.

By downplaying the costs, supporters of the tax bill avoided stricter budget rules that would have forced them to either reduce the size of the cuts or find ways to pay for them—such as cutting government programs or increasing other taxes.

What Economists Say About the Real Cost

Leading economists have warned that the TCJA, when properly accounted for, adds significantly to the national debt.

Key points:

• The CBO estimated that if the temporary cuts were made permanent, it would increase the debt by nearly $3 trillion over the next two decades.
• Moody’s Analytics warned that the tax cuts would not pay for themselves, contradicting one of the bill’s key justifications.
• The Tax Policy Center found that over time, most of the benefits would flow to the top 1% of earners.

Even former Republican officials, like Bruce Bartlett—who helped design the Reagan tax cuts—called the TCJA “fiscally irresponsible.”

The Long-Term Consequences for Americans

The decision to exclude trillions in Trump’s tax bill debt has serious implications for the average American. Here’s why it matters:

1. Ballooning National Debt

The U.S. national debt is already over $34 trillion. Adding several more trillion dollars without offsetting revenue increases or spending cuts can strain government resources. That could lead to:

• Higher interest rates
• Reduced funding for public services
• Increased pressure to cut Social Security, Medicare, or education

2. Threats to Future Tax Policy

If these tax cuts are extended without being paid for, it will become harder for future governments to pass new programs or respond to economic crises. There’s less fiscal room to maneuver when debt is this high.

3. Undermining Public Trust

When officials manipulate numbers to make laws look cheaper, it damages public trust in government. Voters expect honesty, especially when it comes to policies that affect their taxes, income, and future opportunities.

Who Benefits Most from the Tax Bill?

Despite the rhetoric about helping the middle class, data shows the biggest winners from Trump’s tax bill were:

• Large corporations (permanent tax cut from 35% to 21%)
• High-income households
• Wealthy business owners

Meanwhile, the benefits for middle- and lower-income Americans are:

• Temporary
• Smaller in dollar value
• Less likely to make a lasting economic difference

And yet, it is these same middle- and working-class families who may bear the burden when cuts to social programs are proposed to offset rising debt.

Political Reactions and Renewed Debate

The issue of hiding Trump’s tax bill debt has reignited partisan debates in Washington.

• Democrats argue the exclusion of trillions in debt is dishonest and irresponsible.
• Republicans claim the tax cuts boosted economic growth and job creation.

Some moderate lawmakers are calling for greater transparency in budget scoring methods. There’s also talk of reforming the rules that allow such large assumptions to be made without proper debate.

What Needs to Change?

Here are a few proposals being discussed by economists and watchdog groups:

1. Realistic Budget Assumptions

Require the CBO and lawmakers to base estimates on most likely scenarios, not just official timelines.

2. Sunset Rule Reform

Prevent temporary tax cuts from being extended without an honest accounting of their costs.

3. Stricter Budget Rules

Force lawmakers to offset any new debt with spending cuts or revenue increases, avoiding gimmicks.

4. Increased Public Transparency

Make all cost projections, including alternative scenarios, available to the public in plain language.

Conclusion: Why This Matters Now

As the country continues to grapple with rising inflation, income inequality, and record debt, it’s more important than ever for policymakers to be transparent and honest about the cost of legislation. The Senate’s choice to exclude trillions in debt to make Trump’s tax bill seem cheaper isn’t just a technical detail—it’s a decision that could shape the economy for decades.

Whether you supported the 2017 tax cuts or not, every American deserves to know the truth about what their government is spending, how it affects them, and who truly benefits. Without honest numbers, real democracy is impossible.

Read Next – Trump Cuts Worker Protections for Health Aides, Farmers