Politics

Smithsonian review 8 museums under Trump order

Smithsonian review 8 museums is now underway. President Trump has directed a review of eight Smithsonian museums to ensure their exhibits match his administration’s vision of promoting American unity, exceptionalism, and historical pride. The move is part of preparations for America’s 250th anniversary in 2026.

On August 12, 2025, the White House informed Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III that these eight museums will be the focus of the first phase of the review. This follows an executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” issued earlier this year.

The administration says the review aims to highlight positive national achievements, strengthen patriotic narratives, and remove what it considers divisive or ideological content.

The 8 museums under review

The Smithsonian Institution operates 21 museums, but only eight have been chosen for this initial review. They are:

1. National Museum of American History

Covers key events, inventions, and cultural moments in the country’s past.

2. National Museum of Natural History

Holds extensive collections on the natural world, science, and anthropology.

3. National Museum of African American History and Culture

Focuses on African American life, history, and contributions.

4. National Museum of the American Indian

Showcases Native American history, culture, and contemporary issues.

5. National Air and Space Museum

Features aviation and space exploration history, including iconic aircraft and spacecraft.

6. Smithsonian American Art Museum

Houses works from early American art to contemporary pieces.

7. National Portrait Gallery

Displays portraits of influential Americans from politics, culture, and history.

8. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden

Specializes in modern and contemporary art.

These museums represent a wide range of subjects, from science and innovation to history, art, and cultural heritage. The administration says their content should reflect themes of unity and pride, especially leading up to the 250th anniversary.

Why these museums were chosen

The eight museums are among the most visited and influential in the Smithsonian network. They shape public understanding of American history, identity, and values. By focusing on these institutions first, the administration hopes to set the tone for the rest of the Smithsonian.

Officials say the review is not about censoring history but ensuring it is presented in a way that inspires rather than divides. Supporters believe the effort will create a more unifying vision of America, while critics argue it could lead to political interference in museum curation.

The review process

The review will be carried out in two main phases. In the first phase, museums must provide detailed information about their current and planned exhibits, programming for America’s 250th anniversary, internal guidelines, governance structures, and partnerships.

The initial deadline is within 30 days of notification. Each museum must submit:

  • Descriptions of all ongoing and planned exhibitions
  • Details of special programs related to the 250th anniversary
  • Internal curatorial guidelines and approval processes
  • Lists of external partnerships and collaborators

In the second phase, which extends over 120 days, museums will be expected to make changes if their content is deemed inconsistent with the new guidelines. These changes could involve revising exhibit texts, rethinking presentation approaches, or adding new displays to emphasize unity, progress, and American achievement.

The review will also include interviews with curators and senior staff to understand how content is developed and approved.

Goals of the review

According to the White House, the review has several main goals:

  • Align Smithsonian exhibits with narratives of American exceptionalism
  • Highlight unity over division in historical storytelling
  • Ensure accuracy in representing the country’s heritage
  • Inspire pride in national achievements
  • Create consistent themes across museums for the 250th anniversary celebrations

Officials have stated that the review is intended to be collaborative. They want to work with curators and directors to identify ways to improve storytelling without reducing historical accuracy.

Support and criticism

The decision has sparked debate across the cultural and academic community. Supporters argue that national museums should reflect the best of America and celebrate its progress. They see the review as a chance to counterbalance what they view as overly negative or politically motivated narratives in some exhibits.

Critics, including many historians, museum professionals, and civil rights groups, say the move risks undermining academic freedom. They warn that government-led content reviews can lead to historical revisionism, omitting uncomfortable truths in favor of political messaging.

Some fear this could set a precedent for future administrations to reshape cultural institutions based on shifting political agendas.

What happens next

Phase one of the review will focus on the eight museums listed above. Once their evaluations are complete, the White House may expand the process to include the remaining Smithsonian museums and possibly the National Zoo.

A final report on the review’s findings and any recommended changes is expected in early 2026. This timeline would allow updates to be implemented before America’s 250th anniversary celebrations begin.

The Smithsonian’s role in shaping history

The Smithsonian Institution, founded in 1846, has long been a trusted source of history, science, and culture for the American public. Its museums attract millions of visitors annually, and its curators and researchers are respected worldwide.

Because of this influence, any changes to its exhibits can have a significant impact on how people understand and relate to their national story. Whether the current review will strengthen that relationship or create further controversy remains to be seen.

Conclusion

The Smithsonian review 8 museums initiative marks a significant moment in the intersection of politics, history, and cultural preservation. The outcome will not only affect how these institutions present their exhibits but also shape public dialogue about America’s past and future.

As the review moves forward, it will test the balance between patriotic storytelling and scholarly independence. The final decisions will likely be closely watched, not just by historians and museum professionals, but by the public as well.

Do Follow USA Glory On Instagram

Read Next – ‘Diaper Diplomacy’: AI Baby Politicians Go Viral on YouTube

jittu

Recent Posts

Pitt Improves National Standing While Holding Top Public University Position

The University of Pittsburgh, commonly known as Pitt, has maintained its position as 32nd among…

2 months ago

Troy University Earns Top Recognition Among Southern Universities

Troy University has been recognized by U.S. News & World Report as one of the…

2 months ago

Students Thrive at Salisbury University Among Nation’s Best Institutions

Salisbury University has recently been recognized as one of the best colleges in the United…

2 months ago

Hamas Agrees to Release Hostages Amid Hopeful Negotiations

In a significant development, Hamas has announced that it will release all remaining hostages held…

2 months ago

Trump Calls for Immediate Halt to Gaza Bombings, Seeks Peace

In a recent statement, President Trump urged Israel to “immediately stop” bombing Gaza, emphasizing his…

2 months ago

Treasury Yields Rise as Oil Prices Make Strong Rebound

U.S. financial markets experienced notable movements as Treasury yields ticked higher and crude oil prices…

2 months ago