At a recent political rally, former U.S. President Donald Trump reignited a global controversy by claiming that white farmers in South Africa are fleeing the country due to what he described as a “genocide.” Trump’s remarks have sparked fresh debate on race, land reform, and political rhetoric ahead of the 2024 U.S. elections.
His comments, first made during his presidency in 2018, were brought up again as he spoke to a crowd in Ohio, claiming that violence against white landowners has intensified and that their situation is being ignored by global leaders.
“White farmers are being killed and chased off their land. It’s a disgrace. It’s a genocide, and nobody is talking about it,” Trump declared.
These claims have been widely criticized in the past, both by human rights organizations and the South African government, which has repeatedly denied any orchestrated campaign against white farmers.
For more context, read this BBC report on Trump’s 2018 remarks
Revisiting the Controversial ‘White Genocide’ Narrative
Trump’s latest statements appear to echo far-right talking points, particularly the narrative of a “white genocide” in South Africa. This claim suggests that white farmers, especially Afrikaners, are being systematically targeted through land expropriation, violence, and government policy.
While South Africa does have a high rate of violent crime, statistics do not support the claim of a racially motivated genocide against white farmers. In fact, crime affects all communities in the country.
The Africa Check organization has debunked this narrative multiple times, stating that while farm attacks are a concern, they are not disproportionately targeting white farmers.
South Africa’s Land Reform – What’s the Real Issue?
At the heart of the controversy lies South Africa’s effort to address land inequality, a remnant of the apartheid system that ended in 1994. Under apartheid, the majority of agricultural land was owned by the white minority. To reverse this, the government has proposed land expropriation without compensation — a highly polarizing issue.
Supporters of the policy argue that it is a necessary step toward economic justice. Critics, including Trump, argue it leads to economic instability and social unrest.
The South African government has strongly opposed claims of genocide, saying these comments are meant to incite fear and division. In response to Trump’s remarks in 2018, South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation stated that “there is no white genocide taking place in South Africa.”
Political Timing: Trump and the 2024 Elections
Trump’s renewed focus on South African land issues appears strategically timed with his campaign messaging. He often uses themes of victimization, cultural preservation, and global threats to stir emotion among his base.
By referencing a “white genocide,” Trump taps into far-right fears of demographic change, reverse racism, and globalism — themes that are recurrent in his campaign speeches.
Some analysts suggest this is a way for Trump to solidify support among conservative and nationalist voters.
Political science expert Dr. John Harris of Georgetown University told NPR,
“Trump’s rhetoric on South Africa plays into a broader message about preserving Western civilization, national identity, and resisting liberal global narratives.”
Read more analysis from NPR on Trump’s global policy remarks
Reaction from South African Leaders and Communities
South Africa’s leaders and civil society groups were quick to respond. President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the remarks indirectly during a recent press briefing, reaffirming the government’s commitment to land reform while maintaining the rule of law.
“South Africa will not tolerate misinformation that seeks to destabilize our society. Our land reform process will be legal, fair, and inclusive,” said Ramaphosa.
Many South Africans, including white farmers, have also pushed back against Trump’s claims. Several farmer organizations clarified that while crime is a serious issue, painting the picture of genocide is inaccurate and dangerous.
For example, the Agri SA farming union emphasized that “farm attacks affect all races and should be addressed with improved rural safety measures — not racial division.”
Global Concerns About Misinformation and Racial Tension
Trump’s comments have once again raised alarms about the global spread of misinformation, especially around racially sensitive issues.
Social media has been a major driver of the “white genocide” myth, and Trump’s public platform gives it international exposure. Human rights organizations have warned that such narratives could fuel violence, racism, and political instability.
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has documented how extremist groups in the U.S. and Europe have used South Africa’s situation to recruit followers and promote white nationalist ideologies. Read SPLC’s coverage on the use of South Africa in far-right propaganda
Closing Thoughts: Reality or Political Fear-Mongering?
While the situation for farmers in South Africa — both black and white — is complex and worthy of attention, framing it as a “genocide” misrepresents reality. Experts agree that farm attacks are part of broader crime issues, not a racial extermination effort.
Trump’s language, though influential, lacks evidence and may do more harm than good by deepening racial divides and spreading fear.
As global audiences tune in, the real question remains: Is this about helping South African farmers — or winning votes in the U.S.?
Also Read – New Texas Law Shields Abuse Survivors from Harmful NDAs
