USDOT Allocates $5.4 Billion for Bridges—Diversity Rules Cut

The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) has approved a massive $5.4 billion allocation to repair and rebuild bridges across the country. This critical investment is part of President Biden’s larger infrastructure goals under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, but with a controversial twist—diversity and inclusion requirements have been removed from the funding process.

The move has sparked mixed reactions from local governments, civil rights groups, and industry leaders. While many applaud the injection of funds into aging infrastructure, others warn that eliminating diversity criteria may undermine efforts to ensure equity in federal projects.

Read more on USDOT’s official infrastructure funding programs.

What is Bridge Funding and Why Does it Matter?

Bridge funding refers to financial support for building, repairing, or replacing bridges that are either structurally deficient or at risk of failure. Across the United States, more than 222,000 bridges are in need of repair or maintenance, according to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA).

This funding round is part of the Bridge Investment Program, first launched in 2022 as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The goal is to improve safety, reduce transportation costs, and promote economic growth by modernizing key transportation arteries.

Find details about past bridge investments on the Federal Highway Administration site.

Where the $5.4 Billion Will Go

According to USDOT, the $5.4 billion will be distributed to states, local agencies, tribes, and territories to fund over 4,500 bridge projects across the country. Each jurisdiction must submit an application proving the urgency, necessity, and feasibility of the proposed project.

Some of the major projects expected to receive funding include:

• The Brent Spence Bridge connecting Ohio and Kentucky
• The Golden Gate Bridge retrofit in California
• The I-10 Calcasieu River Bridge replacement in Louisiana
• Various rural bridge upgrades in South Dakota and Montana

The DOT emphasized that the funding is not limited to urban areas, ensuring smaller communities and rural locations are included in this round.

Removal of Diversity Requirements Raises Concerns

In a notable policy reversal, the DOT has decided to remove the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria from the bridge funding application process. In previous rounds, applicants were encouraged to show how projects would benefit underserved or minority communities, and prioritize contractors with diverse hiring practices.

This change comes amid growing political pressure and legal challenges around race-conscious federal programs. DOT officials stated the decision was made to “streamline funding processes” and “ensure compliance with recent court rulings” related to affirmative action and race-based decision-making.

But civil rights advocates, including the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, argue this move could disproportionately harm minority-owned construction firms and reduce investments in historically underfunded communities.

Explore how DEI policies shape infrastructure on the Brookings Institution’s website.

Political Reactions to the Policy Shift

The policy change has become a hot-button issue in Washington. Some Republican lawmakers celebrated the removal of DEI language, arguing it prioritizes “merit-based” infrastructure development.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) called the move “a step toward depoliticizing infrastructure investment.”

Meanwhile, Democratic leaders like Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) criticized the decision, saying, “This is a clear regression. Equity must remain a cornerstone in how we rebuild America.”

The White House has not officially commented on the change but continues to promote the Infrastructure Law as a “historic investment in rebuilding the nation.”

What’s Next for Bridge Projects and Equity?

As agencies begin receiving and distributing the $5.4 billion, contractors, engineers, and local governments will move quickly to begin long-awaited repairs. However, the long-term implications of the DEI policy rollback are still unknown.

Experts suggest that some states may still apply local-level diversity or equity requirements, even without a federal mandate. Others may opt for a “colorblind” approach, focusing solely on the infrastructure needs and technical merits of each proposal.

Analysts from the Urban Institute have warned that without a focus on equity, certain communities—particularly low-income and minority neighborhoods—could be overlooked once again.

Check out the Urban Institute’s report on equitable infrastructure here.

Public Voices: Infrastructure Wins, But At What Cost?

Public opinion remains divided. In online forums, town halls, and social media debates, Americans are asking:

• “Are we really solving the problem if we ignore who benefits?”
• “Shouldn’t the priority be fixing broken bridges, period?”
• “How do we ensure minority-owned businesses still get opportunities?”

One local contractor in Baltimore shared, “This funding is a big win. But without DEI, I worry that smaller Black- and Latino-owned firms will be pushed out by bigger players.”

Conclusion: Bridging Gaps, But Leaving Some Behind?

The $5.4 billion in bridge funding from USDOT marks a significant milestone in U.S. infrastructure policy. Roads, bridges, and highways across the nation are finally getting the attention—and money—they desperately need.

However, the decision to strip diversity and equity requirements from the funding process introduces a new layer of controversy. While some praise the move as efficient and race-neutral, others warn it may widen long-standing disparities in federal infrastructure spending.

Only time will tell whether this round of funding helps bridge the physical and social divides that shape America’s future.

For continuous updates on infrastructure and transportation, visit Transportation.gov.

Also Read – Small Town Pride: North Dakota’s LGBTQ+ Voices Rise Up